🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the book Authentic, speaker Burey poses a challenge: typical injunctions to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they can be pitfalls. Burey’s debut book – a mix of memoir, investigation, cultural critique and discussions – aims to reveal how organizations take over individual identity, shifting the weight of corporate reform on to individual workers who are frequently at risk.

Personal Journey and Broader Context

The driving force for the publication originates in part in the author’s professional path: different positions across business retail, new companies and in worldwide progress, interpreted via her experience as a disabled Black female. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and seeking protection – is the core of the book.

It arrives at a period of general weariness with institutional platitudes across the United States and internationally, as resistance to diversity and inclusion efforts grow, and numerous companies are reducing the very frameworks that earlier assured change and reform. Burey delves into that arena to argue that withdrawing from the language of authenticity – namely, the organizational speech that minimizes personal identity as a set of appearances, idiosyncrasies and hobbies, keeping workers focused on handling how they are viewed rather than how they are handled – is not the answer; instead, we need to redefine it on our individual conditions.

Minority Staff and the Act of Identity

By means of detailed stories and conversations, the author demonstrates how marginalized workers – people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, women, disabled individuals – soon understand to calibrate which identity will “fit in”. A weakness becomes a drawback and people try too hard by attempting to look palatable. The effort of “showing your complete identity” becomes a reflective surface on which numerous kinds of anticipations are projected: affective duties, revealing details and continuous act of thankfulness. As the author states, we are asked to share our identities – but without the defenses or the reliance to survive what arises.

As Burey explains, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the safeguards or the reliance to endure what emerges.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

She illustrates this situation through the account of Jason, a deaf employee who decided to educate his colleagues about deaf community norms and interaction standards. His readiness to share his experience – a gesture of transparency the workplace often praises as “genuineness” – for a short time made routine exchanges more manageable. However, Burey points out, that progress was fragile. When staff turnover wiped out the unofficial understanding he had established, the atmosphere of inclusion dissolved with it. “All the information left with them,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the exhaustion of needing to begin again, of having to take charge for an institution’s learning curve. According to Burey, this is what it means to be requested to reveal oneself lacking safeguards: to risk vulnerability in a framework that applauds your openness but fails to formalize it into procedure. Genuineness becomes a snare when organizations rely on employee revelation rather than structural accountability.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

The author’s prose is at once lucid and poetic. She blends academic thoroughness with a style of solidarity: an offer for followers to lean in, to interrogate, to disagree. For Burey, professional resistance is not overt defiance but principled refusal – the act of rejecting sameness in settings that require appreciation for simple belonging. To dissent, in her framing, is to interrogate the stories institutions describe about fairness and belonging, and to refuse participation in rituals that perpetuate inequity. It may appear as naming bias in a gathering, choosing not to participate of unpaid “inclusion” effort, or defining borders around how much of one’s identity is made available to the institution. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an assertion of self-respect in environments that typically encourage obedience. It is a habit of integrity rather than rebellion, a method of insisting that one’s humanity is not dependent on organizational acceptance.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids brittle binaries. Authentic avoids just toss out “sincerity” entirely: instead, she calls for its redefinition. For Burey, authenticity is not simply the raw display of individuality that organizational atmosphere frequently praises, but a more intentional correspondence between one’s values and individual deeds – a principle that opposes distortion by corporate expectations. Rather than viewing genuineness as a requirement to overshare or adapt to cleansed standards of openness, Burey advises followers to maintain the elements of it grounded in sincerity, self-awareness and moral understanding. From her perspective, the aim is not to abandon authenticity but to move it – to move it out of the executive theatrical customs and to relationships and workplaces where confidence, justice and responsibility make {